Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Jan 22 10:45:17 CST 2004
Hi William Oh, very delicate! Thanks. /gustav > Date: 2004-01-22 17:35 > ...Novell claims it still holds the copyright to Unix which SCO claims > ...I'm not aware of Novell claiming Linux is proprietary as yet ...but if > the SCO claims re Linux code coming from Unix hold up in court then the > Novell claims to Unix will become much more important ...as a major investor > in Linux, Novell could then counter SCO's claims to copyright and make it a > whole new ballgame ...rather twisted I know but that's the current status > :(((( > ...and just to confuse the game more, the Massachusetts AG has suggested > that Microsoft's investment in SCO that financially enabled SCO to pursue > their Linux claims may violate Microsoft's anti-trust settlement agreements > :) > ...ain't life grand? :)))) > William Hindman > <http://www.freestateproject.org> - Next Year In The Free State! > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gustav Brock" <gustav at cactus.dk> > To: "Discussion of Hardware and Software issues" > <dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:07 AM > Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Xandros running MS Office? >> Hi Arthur >> >> I have seen no statements indicating Novell should have this idea. Why >> do you think so? >> >> /gustav >> >> >> > Date: 2004-01-22 00:11 >> >> > Who knows which way the lawsuits may fall, but SCO and Novell (especially >> > the former) seem to have the idea that Linux is indeed proprietary, since it >> > allegedly contains code copied directly from the Unix kernel. >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> > [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Gustav Brock >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 3:04 AM >> > To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues >> > Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Xandros running MS Office? >> >> >> > Hi William >> >> > Linux proprietary ... that was new, William. >> >> > /gustav