JMoss
jmoss111 at bellsouth.net
Tue Jun 8 12:06:42 CDT 2004
Computer math falls into two major categories, integer and floating point. The location of a decimal point can be moved or "floated" according to it's precision. Integer math results in round numbers and is limited in size based on whether it is a small integer, normally 2 bytes or a long integer, normally 4 bytes. Floating point math results in numbers with a decimal point or a large number that can not be represented as an integer. I know less than nothing about processor architecture, but read that AMD's floating point engine was better than Intel's, or maybe that the AMD design was based on RISC technology which added and extra calculation engine? Just my take on thing: Since Intel was the first kid on the block they probably were more profitable early due to minimal competition than they are now which made them a financially stronger company. I think that AMD and others had to go heavily into debt to try and catch up, and do a lot of price cutting just to buy market share. Intel has had a head start, more resources for R&D and advertising, is firmly entrenched in corporate America as most CIOs cringe at the mention of AMD, and they have several exclusive agreements with some large system houses such as Dell. My opinion is that Intel makes a fine microprocessor as does AMD. It's just my humble opinion that day in and day out I get more bang for my buck with AMD. I may very well be wrong about all of this, but that is my opinion. jm -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Jon Tydda Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:22 AM To: Dba-Tech (E-mail) Subject: RE: [dba-Tech] Laptop Recommendation So what are floating point calculations all about? And if AMD are that good, why are Intel the much bigger company with 95% of the market? Jon -----Original Message----- From: JMoss [mailto:jmoss111 at bellsouth.net] Sent: 08 June 2004 17:20 To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: RE: [dba-Tech] Laptop Recommendation I don't remember what I had for breakfast this morning, but going back 13 years, I almost remember that being one of the the main reasons for choosing the AMD 386 DX40 over Intel, however the overall price/performance advantage did weigh in. jm -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Mitsules, Mark S. (Newport News) Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:57 AM To: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues' Subject: RE: [dba-Tech] Laptop Recommendation If I'm not mistaken, floating point calculations have always been the strongest feature of AMD processors. Mark -----Original Message----- From: JMoss [mailto:jmoss111 at bellsouth.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:48 AM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: RE: [dba-Tech] Laptop Recommendation I've been using AMD processors for 13 years and never owned an Intel processor, but the United Devices cancer research program that runs on my AMD Athlon 2500 (1.8 ghz) speaks volumes to me about AMD vs Intel performance comparisons. The benchmark system for the UD program is a 1.5 GHz P4 and has a rating of 100. My AMD 1.8GHz machine consistently produces rating numbers in the 170 - 180 area. Most other volunteer participants report similar results. An interesting fact is that the UD Cancer research program is partially sponsored by Intel, which doesn't necessarily mean that their code is optimized for Intel processors, but I'd say that it's not likely optimized for AMD processors either. jm -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Francisco H Tapia Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:18 AM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Laptop Recommendation I'm looking towards the AMD64 laptops for my next pc/laptop. Athlon's for me have performed leaps and bounds over P4's. In fact, Ghz per Ghz, I have an AMD 2000 (1.6ghz) at home and a P4 1.6ghz at work, and can you guess wich runs faster? :) with the new batch of AMD64 they are putting dual cores so that's one other reason i'm holding off, that and the next gen in video connectivity (pciexpress) i'm sure they'll have something similar for laptops that or the adaption that ATI was working on for replacable video cards :o) The information in this e-mail is confidential and may also be legally privileged. The contents are intended for recipient only and are subject to the legal notice available on request from : webmaster at alcontrol.co.uk ALcontrol Laboratories is a trading division of ALcontrol UK Limited. Registered Office: Templeborough House, Mill Close, Rotherham, S60 1BZ. Registered in England and Wales No 4057291 _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com