Erwin Craps - IT Helps
Erwin.Craps at ithelps.be
Thu Mar 17 04:01:04 CST 2005
I was a unbeliever first, because they use compression, and compression is a two side (sender/receiver) technique. After reading the "how it works" section I understood the technique they use. Technicaly it works, but I have some questions about it. Basicly it work like this. The user requests a webpage. Instead of getting the page from the actual webserver, it sends a request via prot 7000 to the compression server of Onspeed. The Onspeed compression server then collects the page from the original webserver, compresses it. Then the user donwnloads the compressed page from the Onspeed server. These are my remarks. Negative: 1) Time is lost because you add an addtional transaction in requestion the webpage. 2) Time is lost because it needs compression at onstream server 3) Time is lost bcause it needs decompressing at user side. 4) The overall internet gets more saturated (slower) because 1 file is send TWICE over the internet (1x uncompressed, 1x compressed and some communication overhead). 5) Compression is already more and more build in to webservers (IIS6) and webbrowsers. This would mainly work on older or non compressing supporting systems. 6) Privacy, altough they claim that no spyware is installed, and this is probably true because they don't need it. Because every webpage and E-mail you see is requested at the onspeed server. They know EXACTLY what webpages you visite by the second, because you always get the webpage from onspeed, nver from the real webserver!!! 7) What guarante you have the pages are not changed when delivering to you. Who says that an add from x is not replaced by an ad of y??? 8) They will need VERY SPEEDY SERVER and VERY HIGH bandwith because with this effect you create 1 single bottleneck.... 9) This technique is compleetly pointless in a matter of time and has only his advantage as long as not all webservers have build in compression. 10) Will a 2K webpage really be THAT much faster over a broadband connection with al that overhead? 11) Compresion on picturs will probably result in a lower but unnoticable quality. Positive: 1) Most webpages are a lot of text so higly compressible. >>>SPEED 2) There are a lot JPG out there that are badly compressed.>>>SPEED 3) Posibly the delay caused by the rerouting and compress/decompress is smaller than the delay caused by the original download.>>>SPEED 4) Posibly a good solution for low speed dial up/GPRS connections. However dial up modems have build in (sometimes hardware) compression. Off-line compression is better than on-line(modem) compression but the profit is not that much.. Erwin -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Andy Lacey Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:22 AM To: Dba Tech Subject: [dba-Tech] OnSpeed Anyone know anything about www.onspeed.com ? It's compression software which claims to radically speed-up your browsing. Anyone any experience of this or similar? I'm being asked by someone and don't know any answers other than what their website says, all of which sounds a little too good to be true (awards galore). -- Andy Lacey http://www.minstersystems.co.uk ________________________________________________ Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2 _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com