[dba-Tech] Ghosting an old HD to a New HD

DJK(John) Robinson djkr at msn.com
Mon Mar 6 02:39:57 CST 2006


Of course the real answer is to go SATA for HDDs.  Better for several
reasons.

John


-----Original Message-----
From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan
Sent: 06 March 2006 06:08
To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Ghosting an old HD to a New HD


On 5 Mar 2006 at 23:14, Josh McFarlane wrote:

> How's that work?
> 
> I would have figured the bottleneck would be at the source of the 
> bottleneck. If you use a ATA 33 cable, you're capped at 33, if you use 
> an ATA 66/100, you've got independant channels for each device, and 
> thus shouldn't have any problem between the drives, unless of course 
> you're using an old controller that doesn't support the higher 
> standards.
> 
> Can you post a link to somewhere that explains that the controllers 
> clock-down to the lowest device on the independant cables?
> 

I posted it over the weekend:
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/if/ide/conf_Performance.htm
for all the gory details and 
http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/ref/hdd/if/ide/confRecommendationsht
ml for recommended configurations in different situations. 
-- 
Stuart


_______________________________________________
dba-Tech mailing list
dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the dba-Tech mailing list