DJK(John) Robinson
djkr at msn.com
Mon Mar 6 06:52:04 CST 2006
Just a word of caution regarding Stuart's links (which are actually the same article, reprinted). The article appears to have been written at least six years ago. While it *may* have been accurate at the time (and it does contradict itself), it is rather antiquated in computer terms: "I wouldn't look for Serial ATA to even be introduced to the market until late 2001 or even 2002." So when it refers to "the last five years" it's talking about the last century! John -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: 06 March 2006 06:08 To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Ghosting an old HD to a New HD On 5 Mar 2006 at 23:14, Josh McFarlane wrote: > How's that work? > > I would have figured the bottleneck would be at the source of the > bottleneck. If you use a ATA 33 cable, you're capped at 33, if you use > an ATA 66/100, you've got independant channels for each device, and > thus shouldn't have any problem between the drives, unless of course > you're using an old controller that doesn't support the higher > standards. > > Can you post a link to somewhere that explains that the controllers > clock-down to the lowest device on the independant cables? > I posted it over the weekend: http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/if/ide/conf_Performance.htm for all the gory details and http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/ref/hdd/if/ide/confRecommendationsht ml for recommended configurations in different situations. -- Stuart _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com