John Bartow
john at winhaven.net
Mon Dec 14 09:47:10 CST 2009
Interesting, thanks! -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Lawrence Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 2:45 PM To: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues' Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Outlook question Here is a computer of an older design and it works very well... and it does not have to be reformated every so many years: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0anIyVGeWOI Jim -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Tydda Jon - Slough Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 7:47 AM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Outlook question I remember that, you used to HAVE to reinstall Windows once a year, because otherwise you wouldn't be able to do anything with it after about 14 months. It's a lot better with XP - I hadn't had to reinstall a computer due to a software problem in nearly 10 years until I had a WMI problem at home a couple of years ago, and someone convinced me that life was too short to hunt the error down :-) Good (and getting better) anti-malware software is probably a big help in this too, but better Windows software is undeniably at the root of it. Jon -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Bartow Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 3:40 PM To: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues' Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Outlook question Some people who consider themselves "techies" never let go of old procedures and can't be convinced that they should. A very arrogant fellow I know (on university staff) I know still reformats and reinstalls windows every year because that was considered by some to be a good practice back in Windows 95 days. I doubt he will ever stop doing this. I optimize and rejuvenate PCs all the time and in ten years have probably had to reformat and reinstall a dozen times. That's generally caused by a bad infection that someone else tried and failed to remediate, not because windows needs it. He doesn't care because some "expert" recommended that he do what he does and I'm certainly not as much of an expert because I don't have my PhD. -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Susan Harkins Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 9:18 AM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Outlook question Thanks Lambert -- exactly what I needed. :) You know -- like John -- the first thing I thought of was... who's not running virus protection? But, even so, I have to be responsible for what I write. Now, I vaguely remember all this, but I guess it's just so old that my old brain has let it go to make room for newer more exciting stuff. :) Susan H. > AFIK, Outlook has had various security patches in place for year that > prevent it from running any scripts in HTML formatted messages and to > hide > unhealthy attachments. See this old article for instance... > http://windowsitpro.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=9132 > > In any case it's pretty lame to say "don't open a message, you might > get a > virus infection." This might be true of you have no or out of date > anti-virus software but only a very foolish Windows user would do that. > No? > > Lambert > > -----Original Message----- > From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Susan > Harkins > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 9:36 AM > To: DBA Tech List > Subject: [dba-Tech] Outlook question > > In a recent blog, I showed the readers how to disable the automatic "read" > setting -- you know how Outlook bolds messages until they're "read?" > > So, there's a simple setting that still allows you to view the message > in the Reader Pane, but doesn't unbold the message header. > > Well, I've got a couple of readers who are claiming that this > "automatically opens" the message and allows viruses in. > > They might be right, but I admit I'm confused. Anyone know what > they're talking about? > > http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/msoffice/?p=2354&tag=leftCol;post-23 > 54 > > Susan H. > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com This communication and its attachments, if any, may contain confidential and privileged information the use of which by other persons or entities than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from your system. _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com