DJK(John) Robinson
djkr at msn.com
Mon Jul 6 11:16:32 CDT 2009
"Relational databases give you too much. They force you to twist your object data to fit a RDBMS" Duh! That's a bit like complaining that COBOL compilers 'force' you to write in COBOL. Sounds like the hammer-owners have woken up. [Now, what can I stir my cocktail with? Hmm, it'll have to be this *small* hammer...] John -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Fuller Sent: 05 July 2009 11:32 To: Discussion concerning MS SQL Server Subject: [dba-Tech] NoSQL Movement Gains Steam As the old wag said, "When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." In our case, the hammer is SQL. But some very large companies have decided that for their needs, the overhead of SQL is overkill. These companies include some big names like Facebook and Adobe and several lesser-known but big players (i.e. multiple terabytes and even petabytes of structurally simple data). Facebook replaced MySQL with a system developed in-house called Cassandra, which can write 500 GB of data in 0.12 milliseconds, more than 2500 times faster than MySQL. You can read about this at http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source/anti-database-movement-gains-steam-92 4?page=0,0&source=rss_infoworld_news Arthur _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com