Kathryn Bassett
kathryn at bassett.net
Fri May 22 14:26:01 CDT 2009
I've used Outlook (first as a "stand alone" program) since either OL95 or OL98. Can't remember which I used. Later started using the stand alone for Access, then later upgraded to full office package since that was simpler to update. Just took the plunge to Office2007, mainly because I'm using that now at my client's place, and it's less confusing to be using two different versions. Kathryn > -----Original Message----- > From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech- > bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gary Kjos > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:35 AM > To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues > Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Outlook PST troubles > > Well I like Outlook myself. I've had only minimal issues ever with it. > I've used it on my personal system for ten or more years, since Office > 95 I think. Outlook 95 had some significant issues though and so there > was an Outlook 98 I think it was even though there wasn't any other > Office app with that moniker. I think it was even a free upgrade to > the 95 customers as I recall. I upgraded to XP (2002) and later to > 2003 and now to 2007 at home. Never had a lick of problems with > anything since that 95 version as I recall. Here at work we used 1997 > version when I started here in 1999 and then updated to 2K not long > after and I stayed on that for until around 2006 when I switched > systems and got office 2003 on that which I remain on. Again,never had > any trouble at all here at work with Outlook. We use Exchange though > so it's a little different animal. > > Outlook does use a lot of client resources though. So I understand > that some people might have some problems with it in that regard. > > GK > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Steve Erbach <erbachs at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Gary, > > > > Yeah, it's for dummies, all right! I've never liked it. Only used > it > > where I last worked (so long ago...) because that's what they had. > > > > Steve Erbach > > Neenah, WI > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Gary Kjos <garykjos at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Not specific to Corruption but there are for dummies books on > outlook > >> > >> http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Outlook-2007-For-Dummies/Bill- > Dyszel/e/9780470038307/?itm=7 > >> > >> http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Outlook-2003-for-Dummies/Bill- > Dyszel/e/9780764537592/?itm=12 > >> > >> http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Microsoft-Outlook-2000-for- > Dummies/Bill-Dyszel/e/9780764504716/?itm=40 > >> > >> http://oreilly.com/catalog/9781565927049/ > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Steve Erbach <erbachs at gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> Susan, > >>> > >>> There was some good info in your article. Like I said to John, I > >>> wonder if there's a "For Dummies" book on dealing with Outlook > >>> corruption. I've NEVER used it personally except when I worked at > my > >>> last job...and there the network admin was fully up to the task of > >>> making it work properly. > >>> > >>> Steve Erbach > >>> Neenah, WI > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dba-Tech mailing list > > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > > > -- > Gary Kjos > garykjos at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com