Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Fri Oct 2 10:05:56 CDT 2009
Hi Jim True, most production servers need to run continuously. My question is related to small setups, thus your #3 probably not implementable; however, your #2 about the diskdrives is certainly valid as 2½" drives have become common for many tasks. A variation on this is USB sticks. Now in the multi GB range, has anyone used these for system disks? As for #1 we do this routinely. Highly recommended as you can access the server screen both on-site and off-site. /gustav >>> accessd at shaw.ca 01-10-2009 18:39 >>> Gustav: Servers have to be running 24x7. The main costs of a computer are: 1. Monitors and on a server. Removing them and doing a remote connection is a gimme. 2. Hard drives. The power costs can be reduces by using larger drives instead of adding more drives. The newer drivers are much more efficient anyway. If you really want to reduce the costs upgrade the older failed drives to use laptop drives 3. The various cooling fans. Google has a site with thousands of computers and the way they lower the costs is by removing all the mother boards from any cases. Stacking them, in the open, in groups, lining them up and down vertically and having a single fan blowing up from underneath. You can also make sure the computers are in an area where there is decent ventilation (a closet is not where they should be stored) and maybe even an air-conditioning area. Maybe storing them in a dry basement where the temperature remains cool? You can also set the computers bios to only turn on and off the CPU or video fans when the temperature exceeds a certain value. Of course you could always off-load some of the least used server apps to remote inexpensive hosts, where electricity is cheap. (Switzerland or Canada (west coast)) HTH Jim -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:13 AM To: dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com Subject: [dba-Tech] Server with low power consumption Hi all Has anyone worked seriously with minimizing power consumption of small servers? Here, charges for electricity has reached a new high at about $0.35/0.25 per kWh. This means that power costs for a machine using 200W running continuously will reach $610/430 per year. No kidding. Thus, for ourselves and a couple of clients, we are trying to work out any model for reducing these costs while, of course, not losing features or services. One method is easy: Replace existing servers with new models using less power. However, that is not enough. Other ideas are: 1. Move services to "the cloud". This cuts power costs as well as machine inventory costs to zero but introduces new costs for rental of CPU time and probably higher speed bandwidth of internet connections. 2. Introduce standby methods for servers. Quite often servers are idle at night or most of the night. But is the OS (typical Windows) able to set the machine at some standby level while keeping it responsive? 3. Introduce shut-down of servers. If OS permits, shut down the server after some time of inactivity. Power must be turned on by a remote call of Wake-up-LAN which most machines are capable of. 4. Move server OS to laptops. Laptops are per definition built to consume as little power as possible and do have all sorts of hardware that can control or be controlled to use only the power needed. As an additional bonus, laptops have built in emergency power supply (the battery). If any of you have had similar considerations and/or practical experiences implementing these, I would be pleased to learn. /gustav