[dba-Tech] [dba-OT] LCD vs Plasma

Rocky Smolin rockysmolin at bchacc.com
Fri Oct 16 14:08:02 CDT 2009


Thank you.  Is there anything that is NOT on the web?
 
Rocky


-----Original Message-----
From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gary Kjos
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:13 AM
To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] [dba-OT] LCD vs Plasma

40"  or Maybe 42"

http://www.screenmath.com/

GK

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Rocky Smolin <rockysmolin at bchacc.com>
wrote:
> So our current tube is a 32" diagonal - 20H x 26W.  It's a pretty good 
> size for the room its in.  What size in the 16:9 is equivalent?
>
> Rocky
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Tydda Jon 
> - Slough
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 7:14 AM
> To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] [dba-OT] LCD vs Plasma
>
> Go to a proper electrical retailer and compare the picture quality of 
> any of the brands you're interested in. Then you won't even think 
> about LG or Toshiba once you've seen the Sony's and Samsungs, honestly.
>
>
> Jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky 
> Smolin
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 3:08 PM
> To: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues'; 'Off Topic'
> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] [dba-OT] LCD vs Plasma
>
> Costco has mostly LG and Toshiba.  Any opinions on those?
>
> Rocky
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John 
> Bartow
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 6:06 AM
> To: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues'
> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] [dba-OT] LCD vs Plasma
>
> Good bit of advice!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gary Kjos
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 9:11 AM
> To: Off Topic
> Cc: List
> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] [dba-OT] LCD vs Plasma
>
> YOU decide to stretch or not stretch when the content is not 16x9.
> Many people feel that bigger is better even if it's distorted. Others 
> dislike the distortion. I generally just avoid the narrow format 
> content for the most part. Are you going to be connecting to cable or 
> satellite or watching over the air via antenna? Or mostly DVD's?
> Pretty much all the prime time network stuff is wide screen now. I use 
> cable and we have about 50 High Definition wide screen channels and I 
> tend to stick to those about 95% of the time. There are some sporting 
> events - Minnesota Gopher Hockey in particular - that I still have to 
> resort to narrow screen content on. Or did last year. I am hoping that 
> they go HD this year. Once you taste the HD content you won't want to go
back to "regular"
> TV.
>
> LCD uses less electricity. LCD is much LIGHTER in weight for the same 
> size screen. LCD is a bit brighter. Plasma has more "true colors" that 
> match the movie theater picture supposedly. Plasma is a bit cheaper in 
> the same size screen.
>
> I personally wouldn't go to the store thinking you want one or the other.
> First decide the SIZE you want. Then go at least one bigger
> ;-)  Then go and see what your choices are. Chances are you won't need 
> to decide between the two formats.
>
> If you want begger than 40inches or if you will be doing blue ray 
> DVD's, you should only consider 1080P & 120Hz. Maybe that is all that 
> you can find now anyway. When we bought our 40" Sony we went with 720P 
> because I was told that at 40 inches and below you can't tell the 
> difference between 720p and 1080P. We are very happy with the 720P 
> picture. My 62Inch DLP is 1080i as that was all that was availaible in 
> 2004. 1080P came out later or if it was out then it was prohibitively 
> expensive. Most TV's now do 1080P though so that probably won't be a
decision point for you.
>
> How big it the TV you are planning to replace?  I would say you should 
> find out how TALL that picture is and then look for a TV that has a 
> screen at least that same height regardless of the diagonol numbers on 
> either. For the most part though, especially for those of us with 
> weakening eyesight, bigger IS better.
>
> Oh, and one further thing..... don't forget about SOUND......  If you 
> don't have a surround sound system, you definately should look at 
> those as well when you are buying the TV. If' you've only been using 
> the TV speakers with the old TV you WILL BE AMAZED what even a chinsy 
> surround system will do for your viewing experience. Center channel, 
> reat channel, subwoofer. Good stuff.
>
> GK
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Rocky Smolin 
> <rockysmolin at bchacc.com>
> wrote:
>> So it sounds like LCD over plasma.   Yes?
>>
>> And a toss up between Samsung and Sony although Samsung seems to have 
>> a slight edge in our unofficial poll.
>>
>> Now, another thing I've seen on these TVs - the aspect ratio is 
>> fercockt - flattened out, regular picture stretched to fit the wider 
>> screen.  What's
> up
>> with that?
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dba-ot-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>> [mailto:dba-ot-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Alice 
>> Whalen
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:20 PM
>> To: Off Topic
>> Subject: Re: [dba-OT] [dba-Tech] LCD vs Plasma
>>
>> I have heard that plasmas are being phased out. Gravity has it's
> drawbacks,
>> evidently.
>>
>> Alice
>>> Well it sounds like Samsung has the inside track on these lists.
>>> Still can't figure LCD vs. plasma (vs. LED?).  The room is bright in 
>>> the daytime, dark at night (no surprise there).  I suppose we'd 
>>> watch at
>> night mostly.
>>>
>>> R
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>>> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Bobby 
>>> Heid
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:19 PM
>>> To: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues'
>>> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] LCD vs Plasma
>>>
>>> I have a 52" Samsung 120Hz LCD and love it.  Had it about 4 months now.
>>>
>>> Bobby
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>>> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max 
>>> Wanadoo
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:30 PM
>>> To: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues'
>>> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] LCD vs Plasma
>>>
>>> Rocky,
>>>
>>> I have a 50" Plasma from Samsung.
>>> It is fantastic.  Had it for about 18 months now.
>>>
>>> As well as the other stuff that people have pointed out, there is a 
>>> 2xfactor in refresh rate between the two but I cannot recall which 
>>> is
>> faster.
>>>
>>> All I know is that I have never  regretted buying my Samsung.
>>>
>>> Max
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>>> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky 
>>> Smolin
>>> Sent: 14 October 2009 21:10
>>> To: 'Off Topic'; List
>>> Subject: [dba-Tech] LCD vs Plasma
>>>
>>> Dear Lists:
>>>
>>> I'm getting some pressure to upgrade our big TV to a flat screen.
>>> Looked at a few in Frys the other day.  So what's the difference 
>>> between LCD and plasma?  Which one to get?
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dba-Tech mailing list
>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dba-OT mailing list
>>> dba-OT at databaseadvisors.com
>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-ot
>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dba-OT mailing list
>> dba-OT at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-ot
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dba-OT mailing list
>> dba-OT at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-ot
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gary Kjos
> garykjos at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> This communication and its attachments, if any, may contain 
> confidential and privileged information the use of which by other 
> persons or entities than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you 
> receive this transmission in error, please contact the sender 
> immediately and delete the material from your system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>



--
Gary Kjos
garykjos at gmail.com

_______________________________________________
dba-Tech mailing list
dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com





More information about the dba-Tech mailing list