[dba-Tech] Server with low power consumption

Tydda Jon - Slough jon.tydda at lonza.com
Wed Sep 30 03:49:59 CDT 2009


No, we don't use it on servers. I get shouted at when I even suggest it :-)


Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:48 AM
To: dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Server with low power consumption

Hi Jon

Thanks, that tools look nice. However, it seems aimed at workstations.
Have you used it for servers?

And right, consolidating of physical servers should be on the list as well. For us, we already use VMware where we can. Highly recommended.

/gustav


>>> jon.tydda at lonza.com 30-09-2009 10:20:04 >>>
Hi Gustav

I've not done anything with servers, but I did implement this:
http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=power_mgt.pr_power_mgt_ez_gpo

It's a group policy add-in that'll tell all your computers when to activate the screensavers, go into standby and/or when to hibernate.
It's worked really well here, and it gives you a spreadsheet where you can work out your annual power savings. We're looking at saving around $70,000 a year just at this site.

We have also started using VMWare and Terminal servers to cut down on the amount of physical servers in the comms rack. One big meaty VMWare server can host several smaller servers that don't need the muscle (print server etc), and means it doesn't have the power consumption issues.


Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:13 AM
To: dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: [dba-Tech] Server with low power consumption

Hi all

Has anyone worked seriously with minimizing power consumption of small servers?

Here, charges for electricity has reached a new high at about
$0.35/€0.25 per kWh. This means that power costs for a machine using 200W running continuously will reach $610/€430 per year. No kidding.

Thus, for ourselves and a couple of clients, we are trying to work out any model for reducing these costs while, of course, not losing features or services.

One method is easy: Replace existing servers with new models using less power.

However, that is not enough. Other ideas are:

1. Move services to "the cloud".
This cuts power costs as well as machine inventory costs to zero but introduces new costs for rental of CPU time and probably higher speed bandwidth of internet connections.

2. Introduce standby methods for servers.
Quite often servers are idle at night or most of the night. But is the OS (typical Windows) able to set the machine at some standby level while keeping it responsive?

3. Introduce shut-down of servers.
If OS permits, shut down the server after some time of inactivity.
Power must be turned on by a remote call of Wake-up-LAN which most machines are capable of.

4. Move server OS to laptops.
Laptops are per definition built to consume as little power as possible and do have all sorts of hardware that can control or be controlled to use only the power needed. As an additional bonus, laptops have built in emergency power supply (the battery).

If any of you have had similar considerations and/or practical experiences implementing these, I would be pleased to learn.

/gustav
_______________________________________________
dba-Tech mailing list
dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

This communication and its attachments, if any, may contain confidential and privileged information the use of which by other persons or entities than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from your system.




More information about the dba-Tech mailing list