Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Tue Mar 30 11:58:59 CDT 2010
Hi Janet This sounds strange. I just checked at a client running file, print, exchange including web access, Windows backup, and default SharePoint stuff (which I cannot find out how to switch off). Installed ram is 8 GB, consumed is 4.66 GB. Idle CPU is 0-3%. SQL Server and store.exe each eat 600 MB, IIS and EdgeTransport each ~225 MB, svchost and IIS each ~180 MB, DataCollector and SQL Server*32 each ~160 MB, all other below 80 MB. /gustav >>> jerbach at gmail.com 30-03-2010 18:28 >>> Jim - Like you, we've been backing up to a portable device and taking the disks off-site using Casper. But I was told last week that Casper does not provide a truly bootable image for SBS 2008. I guess I balk at the standard Windows backup from an ease of recoverability standpoint in a total server crash. I like the idea of backups that provide a bootable image that can be restored onto another machine without having to re-install every bit of software. I've never been in that kind of dead-in-the-water situation (thankfully!) so I'm just going by what I imagine the recovery process to be like. Which, of course, is very likely way off the mark. Am I putting too much emphasis on the importance of a bootable image? Thanks for the info on logmein - I will look into that more. On your client's SBS 2008 machine...do you happen to know what the base line day-to-day memory usage is? Ours is running at around 12gb out of 16 total...and I'm starting to think that 2008 is such a resource pig that it really does require that much. I would be curious to know if your client's machine runs like that as well. Janet On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote: > Hi Janet: > > Does not your SBS have a fine backup system built in? The Symantec backup > would have to have a lot of features to make it worth it. We have been > doing > some experimenting with LogMeIn remote and offsite backup and it looks > really good. Here is a review of the product: > > http://reviews.cnet.com/e-mail/logmein-backup/1707-3536_7-31841188.html > > In the office we backup to portable drives and then take them off site. > > On another aside, at a client's site, that is using SBS 2008, we have been > working to get it performance up but the only success we have had is by > maxing out the RAM... 16GB and it is finally up to a good trot. > > Jim > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Janet Erbach > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 6:47 AM > To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues > Subject: [dba-Tech] Symantec Backup Exec > > We've gotten a server upgrade quote from a local consultant who is > recommending that we switch to Symantec's Backup Exec 2010 for backing up > our SBS 2008. Do any of you have any experience with this product? Is it > good? Bad? Ugly? > > Janet Erbach > IT Administrator > Natural Healthy Concepts