rockysmolin at bchacc.com
rockysmolin at bchacc.com
Thu Jan 26 20:01:44 CST 2012
The cappex rule had only if the word cappex appeared in the body. The RockySmolin rule had only if the message was from Rocky. Because the rocky rule came after the cappex rule, as jon noted, the essage moved to the cappex folder then the next rule moved it to the rocky folder. Lembit's solution of putting the rocky rule first worked because after moving the message to the rocky folder, the cappex rule move it to the cappex folder. but if I had said in the cappex rule to stop processing rules if the cappex rule applied, then the cappex rule, placed before the rocky rule, would have worked. R -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Outlook Express From: "Susan Harkins" <ssharkins at gmail.com> Date: Thu, January 26, 2012 6:44 pm To: "Discussion of Hardware and Software issues" <dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com> Or, you could've removed the "from Rocky" criteria, if I'm following this correctly. Susan H. > Per Jon f I had checked stop processing rules if this rule sapplies, the > original Cappex rule would have worked. > > Still using both criteria -- from Rocky with Cappex in the subject? I'm > wondering if you even need the From Rocky criteria. > > Susan H. _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com