Salakhetdinov Shamil
mcp2004 at mail.ru
Sat Feb 2 16:36:20 CST 2013
Hi Hans -- I have just run http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/ . Here are the results: Chrome 24, VM Win7 Ultimate 32bit: => 2739 - HTML5 Capabilities 6/7 Chrome 24, VM Win7 64bit Prof: => 2858 - HTML5 Capabilities 5/7 Chrome 24, "bare metal" Win8 Prof 64bit: => 3152 - HTML5 Capabilities 6/7 http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=6ctT IE9, VM Win7 Ultimate 32bit: => 1139 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 IE9, VM Win7 64bit Prof: => 1220 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 IE10, "bare metal" Win8 Prof 64bit: => 1798 - HTML5 Capabilities 3/7 http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/results?key=6ctc&resultId=2963468 I haven't had IE10 for Win7 tests. As it happens Chrome outperforms IE10 and has almost complete HTML5 capabilities. Thank you. -- Shamil Суббота, 2 февраля 2013, 11:01 -08:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen <hans.andersen at phulse.com>: > >> I don't care that much how impartial the tests are - after all they made for Mozilla and I've tested IE and Chrome - may I assume the tests are impartial? I suppose I may.... >> >> And it doesn't matter for me that IE 10 runs better than Chrome 24 (or Safari) or not - AFAIS IE 10 is not bad at all for everyday tasks - am I missing something? > >It matters because many browsers are implemented differently, but they are all trying to work well enough with the same standard. If a test is designed to work best with your browser (and another one happens to work ok with, but not all of them), then you are testing a non-standard feature. The only thing that has been proven is that Internet Explorer 10 is more compatible with Mozilla Firefox, if you catch my drift. :) > >> Out of just sport interests I'd be curious to run really impartial Javascript tests on IE10 and compare them with Chrome and Safari - what such tests could be IYO? > >These days, performance is pretty decent across all browsers, so it really doesn't matter at all. The only ones who care are the companies/teams behind the browsers, so when searching for any decent javascript benchmarking sites, you will come across one from microsoft, one from mozilla, one from google, etc. > >If you want an impartial test, I might suggest this one: >http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/ > >Futuremark is a company which builds benchmarking software (originally for 3D graphics cards). I would trust them a lot more than I would trust a benchmark from any of the above companies. > >Another one is: http://www.speed-battle.com/ > >SunSpider is another, although it is a little questionable about how impartial it is, at least it's not as biased as the others you pointed out and can be included in the data. > > >- Hans > >