Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Tue Feb 5 17:06:12 CST 2013
His understanding of "tested" is obviously different to mine then :-) -- Stuart On 5 Feb 2013 at 16:44, Peter Brawley wrote: > On 2013-02-05 3:21 PM, Stuart McLachlan wrote: > > Does he have it right? > > > > What does he mean by "written". Is that "documented" or "coded"? > > I assumed documented and they survived analytic walkthrough, 'cuz > 'coded' would make no sense without a data backend. > > PB > > ----- > > > > > He says "use cases and business rules written and tested" To test, you need code. > > That means he is defining "written" as "coded", not "documented".. > > > > Use cases and business rules documented? Yes - that's a fundamental part of systems > > design. > > > > Coded and tested? No way before you have the data model! > > > >