[dba-Tech] Relational v NoSQL

It's hasn't quite yet, but spread the word. These things take time. :)

- Hans


On 2013-02-07, at 5:17 PM, "Jim Lawrence" <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Hi Stuart:
> 
> I thought I recognized your voice. :-)
> 
> I was not aware that MariaDB had supplanted MySQL but I am pleased to hear
> it.
> 
> Jim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:05 PM
> To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Relational v NoSQL
> 
> You'repreaching to the choir here. :-)
> 
> Are you aware of an WAMP/XAMP style packages with MariaDB in place of MySQL?
> 
> -- 
> Stuart
> 
> On 7 Feb 2013 at 8:24, Jim Lawrence wrote:
> 
>> Hi Stuart:
>> 
>> The one thing that could stop any adoption of the new MySQL is Oracle.
>> 
>> "...Since taking control of MySQL, Oracle has jacked up its support prices
>> and switched to an "open core" model, in which the basic version of the
>> database is available for free, but extensions aimed at enterprise
> customers
>> are proprietary, closed source, and cost a pretty penny..."
>> 
>> If the product development, under Oracle, runs true to form few Startup
>> development companies, if any will be following changes in MySQL as they
>> will be moving towards more reliable products or even forks like MariaDB,
>> for example. 
>> 
>> Many (Most) of the major players in the computer industry today, got their
>> start with database products like MySQL. If MySQL was not OSS with a GPL
>> type license we might have not had FaceBook or Amazon or EBay, today. 
>> 
>> If Oracle follows true to form it will not be long before MySQL will no
>> longer be used in the leading edge development market and MySQL will
> follow
>> the route of other over priced products like DBase, FoxPro, Clipper,
>> DataFlex, Paradox, etc, into history.
>> 
>> Jim  
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart
> McLachlan
>> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:37 AM
>> To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
>> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Relational v NoSQL
>> 
>> NoSQL? Memcache?
>> 
>> You could try the new mySQL:
>> 
>> "In addition, MySQL 5.6 allows NoSQL-style access to InnoDB data via the
>> Memcached API. 
>> This means developers can use any of the many existing Memcached clients
> and
>> libraries to 
>> bypass the overhead of query parsing, and grab data as simple key-value
>> pairs, resulting in 
>> as much as a 9x performance improvement for SET/INSERT operations."
>> 
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/06/oracle_mysql_56_vs_mariadb/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dba-Tech mailing list
>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dba-Tech mailing list
>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dba-Tech mailing list
> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com