Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Sun Feb 10 12:36:29 CST 2013
Hi Shamil: I have nothing against IE, personally. OTOH, technically, the last few versions of IE (7 to 9) have been disasters and I am sure you, who would have had to build websites with these products will agree. IE10, seems head and shoulders above it predecessors. It appears that Microsoft is finally, trying to follow the industry standards but unfortunately, the court of public opinion is still out on IE and it will be years before IE is viewed as serious contender...A browser from which code can be written once and run everywhere...without major issues. As for the suggested browser performance; that has not been my or my client's assessment but I take page performance as a whole (with a collection of graphics, program and font libraries, multiple CSS directories and server calls) and have not run separate tests. (I currently only use Chrome tools for testing which suggests a prejudice and of course only runs on/in Chrome.) But I will do, an impartial test, as soon as possible, maybe later this week when a quiet evening arises and will post the results. Jim PS Do you have a copy of MS IE 100 that I could share? -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Salakhetdinov Shamil Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 3:07 AM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] The Windows Surface Pro Hi Hans -- You count me as the only one "consistent MS IE 100 defender" here? :) I can't find PeaceKeeper detailed tests results - do they exist? As for the other tests - I have posted them here already for ASUS N76Vz (notebook model similar to http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007Z9EB0O). According to that tests IE 10 is as good as or better than Chrome 24 for JavaScript/DOM tests but not as good as Chrome 24 for ai, imaging and audio tests. =================================== SunSpider 0.9.1 (smaller is better) ==================================== Chrome 24 - 265 IE 10 - 165 IE 10 "beats" Chrome in all tests: 3d, access, bitops, controflow, crypto, date, math, regexp, string. ================================ kraken-1.1 (smaller is better) ================================ Chrome 24 - 3386 IE 10 - 7432 Chrome 24 "beats" IE 10 in ai, audio, imaging tests. json and stanford tests have nearly the same results. =============================== PeaceKeeper (bigger is better) =============================== Chrome 24 - 3186 IE 10 - 1666 Thank you. -- Shamil Пятница, 8 февраля 2013, 13:45 -08:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen <hans.andersen at phulse.com>: >I gave Shamil a few suggestions. I don't have them all on hand, but there is Peacekeeper from futuremark, as an example. > >- Hans > > >On 2013-02-08, at 9:25 AM, "Jim Lawrence" < accessd at shaw.ca > wrote: > >> Hi Hans: >> >> This discussion has been going back and forth for quite a while and everyone >> can point to dramatic results. One shows that IE10 has superior results to >> Chrome and another shows Chrome has far superior results to IE. >> >> Which one is correct? Which result can be trusted or at least deemed >> impartial? Where would/could these internet performance tests be made? >> >> So where is this independent, unaffiliated benchmarking tool and what are >> the results? >> >> Jim >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Hans-Christian >> Andersen >> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 6:25 PM >> To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues >> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] The Windows Surface Pro >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> I wouldn't trust a benchmark from Mozilla blindly. You should test the >> performance with an independent, unaffiliated benchmarking tool. >> >> - Hans > ><<<skipped >>> _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com