Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Mon Feb 25 22:22:24 CST 2013
Hi Stuart: At the risk of being repetitious, NoSQL is not trying to replace SQL. The only reason similar products Map Reduce are around because SQL can not do the job of managing huge data. SQL databases handles up to a million pieces of data while NoSQL databases handle billions of pieces of data. http://gigaom.com/2013/02/21/sql-is-whats-next-for-hadoop-heres-whos-doing-i t Just think if the UI to NoSQL databases was really easy there goes those big bucks for the techs that manage these ugly monstrosities now get. ;-) Jim -----Original Message----- From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:21 PM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: [dba-Tech] NOSQL goes SQL? So much for NOSQL being the answer to life, the universe and everything. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/25/hortonworks_stinger/ Hortonworks has unveiled the Stinger Initiative, a project to make Hadoop´s Hive data warehouse friendlier with SQL and faster. ... Hadoop is a open-source implementation of Google´s MapReduce and a NoSQL system. However, the NoSQL crowds realised they need to make their architectures work better with SQL-like tools used by businesses in the real world. ... According to Hortonworks, Stinger will make Hive "a more suitable tool for the decision support queries people want to perform on Hadoop". -- Stuart _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com