Salakhetdinov Shamil
mcp2004 at mail.ru
Sun May 12 15:55:35 CDT 2013
Yes, Hans, I did and I have got an impression this article is a fake. And I see a comment to that article which states: "It’s worth point out as well that the “follow up” is written in an entirely different style of verbatim. The vocabulary, structure, word frequencies, and the form and structure of the prose are all different. I’m almost certain that the author is not the same person." Thank you. -- Shamil Воскресенье, 12 мая 2013, 9:28 -07:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen <hans.andersen at phulse.com>: > Yes, although I haven't read all the comments. How about you? Did you read the > whole article? > > - Hans > > > On 2013-05-12, at 5:02 AM, Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru> wrote: > > > Hi Hans -- > > > > Not at all. But may I ask you did you read the whole article you have > referred here? > > > > Thank you. > > -- Shamil > > > > Воскресенье, 12 мая 2013, 1:32 -07:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen > <hans.andersen at phulse.com>: > >> The words of a man who just realised he's possibly in big trouble :p > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Hans-Christian Andersen > >> > >> > >> On 12 May 2013, at 00:01, Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Jim, > >>> > >>> But did you read all the text of the article Hans referenced? > >>> > >>> Thank you. > >>> > >>> -- Shamil > >>> > >>> Суббота, 11 мая 2013, 15:15 -07:00 от "Jim Lawrence" <accessd at shaw.ca>: > >>>> Hi Hans: > >>>> > >>>> The comments from an insider. Nothing that everyone could not all ready > see > >>>> but now a confirmation. At one point the developers, left, will all have > to > >>>> move on, unless the whole upper management of Microsoft can be convinced > to > >>>> move on. > >>>> > >>>> MS may have to be virtually wiped out before it can grow again. > >>>> > >>>> Jim > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > >>>> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of > Hans-Christian > >>>> Andersen > >>>> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 2:52 PM > >>>> To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues > >>>> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] The latest Debian > >>>> > >>>> Fun fact: Debian, on its own (excluding Debian based OSs like Ubuntu), is > >>>> the most widely used operating system in the server market. > >>>> > >>>> Here's another interested article with an admission from a Windows kernel > >>>> developer about why the Windows is slower and falling behind other > >> operating > >>>> systems like Linux: http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=74 > >>>> > >>>> - Hans > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 2013-05-11, at 11:04 AM, "Jim Lawrence" <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The latest Debian is here...Debian 7. > >>>>> > >>>>> With this release, Google has removing its old OS and now is actively > >>>>> porting all it Cloud to Debian. Debian is now using the latest Linux > >>>> core(?) > >>>>> which allows it to run on most of the major hardware architectures, all > 32 > >>>>> and 64 bit Intel chips as well as on ARM, PowerPC, Itanium, IBM S/390 > and > >>>> so > >>>>> on. > >>>>> > >>>>> Debian is not really a PC OS but a true server but it does come with a > >>>> nice > >>>>> little GUI (distro) called Xfce though most "real men and women" in the > >>>>> computer industry still prefer the command line interface. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/08/debian_seven_review/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Of course you can still get all the reliability and functionality > through > >>>>> the Ubuntu and Mint distros which do tend to use more of the leading > edge > >>>>> (bleeding edge?) versions of Debian. Ubuntu, for example is really a > full > >>>>> blown server with a pretty interface and if ever needed, this PC desktop > >>>>> could step up run the entire network, limited of course only by the > >>>>> hardware. (The latest Ubuntu version 13.04, has been described as very > >>>> fast > >>>>> but boring...if you are a support tech you need more boring.) > >>>>> > >>>>> According to some developers Exchange mail server, at least version 2010 > >>>> and > >>>>> less, can runs fine on Debian but the 2012 version still requires some > >>>>> tweaks. The new Samba server completely replaces Active-directory. > >>>> Finally, > >>>>> MS SQL 2012 runs and is fully compatible on Linux. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh568451.aspx > >>>>> > >>>>> It looks like there is now less and less reasons to not migrate your > >>>> servers > >>>>> to Linux and Debian in particular. So why would you change if you have > >>>>> already have a Windows Server system? > >>>>> > >>>>> Answer: First, Linux runs up to three times as fast, can support almost > a > >>>>> dozen times more clients than a similar configured MS server version > >>>> (using > >>>>> the same hardware) and takes only a fifth of the space. Second, the > >>>>> innovation on the Linux platforms are years ahead compared to MS > (Example: > >>>>> Debian uses, by default, a disk OS, that is faster (reading and > writing), > >>>>> with built in duplication and is self-healing but of course you can > always > >>>>> install the ZFS disk OS if you are planning a thousand server network). > >>>>> Third, Linux (Debian) is rock solid reliable; no blue screens or > software > >>>>> crashes. Fourth, security on Linux servers have been the absolute best. > >>>>> Fifth, and perhaps the least important, the initial product costs are > >>>> zero, > >>>>> but of course, tech support fees (your fees) are just the same. > >>>>> > >>>>> So why are you still installing Windows servers? ;-) > >>>>> > >>>>> Jim > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dba-Tech mailing list > >> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dba-Tech mailing list > > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com