Peter Brawley
peter.brawley at earthlink.net
Sun May 12 16:58:02 CDT 2013
On 2013-05-12 2:25 PM, Jim Lawrence wrote: > Hi Shamil and Gustav: > > Taking this discussion from the other side, one big question remains. > > Given that Linux was created with virtually no money and its various > components are designed on very limited budgets, lots of volunteers, in some > cases, working out of their basements, in their spare time, funded from > donations or from tax incentives given out by other large companies which > makes any money source, very tentative at best. It has not been until very > recently that there is some stable money sources for Linux development. > > OTOH, given that Microsoft has a budget that is steady and in the billions. > They can buy the very best developers, systems managers and sales staff > (which in the case of Linux is non-existant). > > Therefore, comparing the two development environments it would be logical > that Microsoft would be able to build a product superior in every way to > Linux...but the opposite is true. > > On comparison, does this suggest that a corporate entity can not produce a > good product? Not at all, think of Oracle. It's prices are expensive but > they have designed some of the best databases in the market. They a fast > reliable, secure, innovative and the products run on all the major > platforms. > > Companies do not mind paying a good price for a product but they expect > quality. Linux (and its related products) has set the bar and in twenty > years Microsoft is now scrambling to keep up and the performance gap keeps > getting wider. > > My question is, why is this so? How do you like Eric Raymond's "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" as an answer to that question? PB ----- > That rant/posting, though questionable may > have given some insight in to the core reasons. Does anyone have a better > suggestion as to the causes and subsequent results? > > I am willing to listen to any suggestion as no one is more frustrated than I > have been, in the last few years, with Microsoft. > > Jim > > -----Original Message----- > From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Salakhetdinov > Shamil > Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 5:20 AM > To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues > Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] The latest Debian > > Hi Gustav -- > > Yes, that article looks like a fake one or authored by a "psycho" with their > superEGO bloated in the first part of the article and lost all their vapor > in the second part. Taking such article into account doesn't look worthwhile > from here... > > And all that conspirology, Kremlinoligy as they say, looks rather stupid. > > Linux is a good OS, no doubt, and it doesn't need such articles to be used > to prove its "superiority" over MS Windows, IMO. > > Thank you. > -- Shamil > > P.S. Typed on WinPhone from the garden house located in NW Russia - doing > some groundwork here :) > Воскресенье, 12 мая 2013, 10:30 +02:00 от "Gustav Brock" <gustav at cactus.dk>: >> Hi Shamil >> >> I don't think so. Neither did Jim, so it seems, as that appended note is > the >> interesting part - written when the fellow had given the original blurb a >> second thought. >> >> I don't get why some are so clever on behalf of Microsoft and its > management >> and are convinced, that MS is nothing but a bunch of idiots. In no >> organisation anything is perfect, neither at MS, but when I think about > it, >> all the speakers and instructors I've met at MS developer events have been >> people I would have a good time working with. More or less, of course, but > I >> don't believe they left all the bad guys back home at MS. >> >> /gustav >> > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com