Salakhetdinov Shamil
mcp2004 at mail.ru
Mon May 13 15:45:24 CDT 2013
Both. -- Shamil Воскресенье, 12 мая 2013, 15:14 -07:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen <hans.andersen at phulse.com>: > > So which one is the fake then? > > - Hans > > > On 2013-05-12, at 1:55 PM, Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru> wrote: > > > Yes, Hans, I did and I have got an impression this article is a fake. And I > see a comment to that article which states: "It’s worth point out as well that > the “follow up” is written in an entirely different style of verbatim. The > vocabulary, structure, word frequencies, and the form and structure of the > prose are all different. I’m almost certain that the author is not the same > person." > > > > Thank you. > > -- Shamil > > > > Воскресенье, 12 мая 2013, 9:28 -07:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen > <hans.andersen at phulse.com>: > >> Yes, although I haven't read all the comments. How about you? Did you read > the > >> whole article? > >> > >> - Hans > >> > >> > >> On 2013-05-12, at 5:02 AM, Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Hans -- > >>> > >>> Not at all. But may I ask you did you read the whole article you have > >> referred here? > >>> > >>> Thank you. > >>> -- Shamil > >>> > >>> Воскресенье, 12 мая 2013, 1:32 -07:00 от Hans-Christian Andersen > >> <hans.andersen at phulse.com>: > >>>> The words of a man who just realised he's possibly in big trouble :p > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> Hans-Christian Andersen > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 12 May 2013, at 00:01, Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Jim, > >>>>> > >>>>> But did you read all the text of the article Hans referenced? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Shamil > >>>>> > >>>>> Суббота, 11 мая 2013, 15:15 -07:00 от "Jim Lawrence" <accessd at shaw.ca>: > >>>>>> Hi Hans: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The comments from an insider. Nothing that everyone could not all ready > >> see > >>>>>> but now a confirmation. At one point the developers, left, will all > have > >> to > >>>>>> move on, unless the whole upper management of Microsoft can be > convinced > >> to > >>>>>> move on. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> MS may have to be virtually wiped out before it can grow again. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jim > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > >>>>>> [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of > >> Hans-Christian > >>>>>> Andersen > >>>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 2:52 PM > >>>>>> To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] The latest Debian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Fun fact: Debian, on its own (excluding Debian based OSs like Ubuntu), > is > >>>>>> the most widely used operating system in the server market. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here's another interested article with an admission from a Windows > kernel > >>>>>> developer about why the Windows is slower and falling behind other > >>>> operating > >>>>>> systems like Linux: http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=74 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Hans > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2013-05-11, at 11:04 AM, "Jim Lawrence" <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> The latest Debian is here...Debian 7. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> With this release, Google has removing its old OS and now is actively > >>>>>>> porting all it Cloud to Debian. Debian is now using the latest Linux > >>>>>> core(?) > >>>>>>> which allows it to run on most of the major hardware architectures, > all > >> 32 > >>>>>>> and 64 bit Intel chips as well as on ARM, PowerPC, Itanium, IBM S/390 > >> and > >>>>>> so > >>>>>>> on. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Debian is not really a PC OS but a true server but it does come with a > >>>>>> nice > >>>>>>> little GUI (distro) called Xfce though most "real men and women" in > the > >>>>>>> computer industry still prefer the command line interface. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/08/debian_seven_review/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Of course you can still get all the reliability and functionality > >> through > >>>>>>> the Ubuntu and Mint distros which do tend to use more of the leading > >> edge > >>>>>>> (bleeding edge?) versions of Debian. Ubuntu, for example is really a > >> full > >>>>>>> blown server with a pretty interface and if ever needed, this PC > desktop > >>>>>>> could step up run the entire network, limited of course only by the > >>>>>>> hardware. (The latest Ubuntu version 13.04, has been described as very > >>>>>> fast > >>>>>>> but boring...if you are a support tech you need more boring.) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> According to some developers Exchange mail server, at least version > 2010 > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>> less, can runs fine on Debian but the 2012 version still requires some > >>>>>>> tweaks. The new Samba server completely replaces Active-directory. > >>>>>> Finally, > >>>>>>> MS SQL 2012 runs and is fully compatible on Linux. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh568451.aspx > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It looks like there is now less and less reasons to not migrate your > >>>>>> servers > >>>>>>> to Linux and Debian in particular. So why would you change if you have > >>>>>>> already have a Windows Server system? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Answer: First, Linux runs up to three times as fast, can support > almost > >> a > >>>>>>> dozen times more clients than a similar configured MS server version > >>>>>> (using > >>>>>>> the same hardware) and takes only a fifth of the space. Second, the > >>>>>>> innovation on the Linux platforms are years ahead compared to MS > >> (Example: > >>>>>>> Debian uses, by default, a disk OS, that is faster (reading and > >> writing), > >>>>>>> with built in duplication and is self-healing but of course you can > >> always > >>>>>>> install the ZFS disk OS if you are planning a thousand server > network). > >>>>>>> Third, Linux (Debian) is rock solid reliable; no blue screens or > >> software > >>>>>>> crashes. Fourth, security on Linux servers have been the absolute > best. > >>>>>>> Fifth, and perhaps the least important, the initial product costs are > >>>>>> zero, > >>>>>>> but of course, tech support fees (your fees) are just the same. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So why are you still installing Windows servers? ;-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jim > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>>>>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>>>>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>>>>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>>>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>>>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>>>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>>>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>>>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>>>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> dba-Tech mailing list > >>> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dba-Tech mailing list > >> dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dba-Tech mailing list > > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com