Tina Norris Fields
tinanfields at torchlake.com
Fri Nov 22 08:59:36 CST 2013
It's interesting to me that the presumption of a right to privacy in the U.S. stems from the assurances of the Fourth Amendment, to be secure from unreasonable search and seizure, combined with the assurances of the Ninth Amendment that rights that haven't been enumerated still exist and are retained by the States and the People themselves. Although the right to privacy wasn't supported by documentation until the Supreme Court 1967 decision, the families I knew while growing up all presumed they had the right to keep certain information to themselves. The concept that some things were nobody else's business is not a new concept. However, I would point out that the American culture wasn't all that clear about its attitudes, as demonstrated by laws on the books that regulated what persons could and couldn't do within their own bedrooms. So, while I believe we have long had a sense of ownership and choice concerning what we reveal to others, we haven't been even-handed in our attitude when it came to prying into the affairs of others. To paraphrase an old saying, it's not so much that we opposed ox-goring as that we opposed having our own ox gored. Best to you, TNF Tina Norris Fields tinanfields-at-torchlake-dot-com 231-322-2787 On 11/21/2013 6:47 PM, Salakhetdinov Shamil wrote: > Hi All -- > > > FYI: > > " Google’s Cerf Says “Privacy May Be An Anomaly”. > > http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/20/googles-cerf-says-privacy-may-be-an-anomaly-historically-hes-right/ > > Your opinions? > >