[dba-Tech] Google’s Cerf Says “Privacy May Be An Anomaly”.

 Hi Jim --

<<<
I think that Bernard Herman is deliberately being ignorant so as to make his position of "no rights to privacy", as any legal challenge to Google's current model, would adversely affect the company's profits. 
>>>
I think so too.

Thank you.

-- Shamil

Friday, November 22, 2013 12:52 PM -07:00 from Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca>:
>Hi Shamil:
>
>The one issue that is being over looked in the article is the extensiveness of lack of privacy.
>
>It took many years before authorities were not just allowed to walk into any person's house without due cause or reason. Also, just by the complexity, separation of information and the difficulty at assembling it, even with public information, everyone was afforded a certain level of privacy. Because of vast distances and limited communication outside an tight community, people could also be guaranteed anonymity. People of various countries have fought long and hard to be able to have a community face and a private face but...
>
>...technology has made that (almost) impossible.
>
>I think that Bernard Herman is deliberately being ignorant so as to make his position of "no rights to privacy", as any legal challenge to Google's current model, would adversely affect the company's profits. 
>
>Jim
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Salakhetdinov Shamil" < mcp2004 at mail.ru >
>To: "Discussion of Hardware and Software issues" < dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com >
>Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:47:39 PM
>Subject: [dba-Tech] Google’s Cerf Says “Privacy May Be An Anomaly”.
>
> Hi All --
>
>
>FYI:
>
>" Google’s Cerf Says “Privacy May Be An Anomaly”. 
>
>http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/20/googles-cerf-says-privacy-may-be-an-anomaly-historically-hes-right/
>
>Your opinions?
>
>
>-- 
>Салахетдинов Шамиль