Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Sun Sep 14 20:11:23 CDT 2014
Hi Mark: Just an aside: A number of (old) clients, who host their own mail are moving to Zimbra. As the client is browser based there is no need to attached to a desktop or any OS. I have heard of offices who have been moving their mail server to a private cloud service through either a hoster like DigitalOcean where a droplet be easily setup: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-vmware-zimbra-open-source-on-a-digitalocean-droplet ...or through the client's OwnCloud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mRJWOl7rdA There is a free trial and community versions (it is also OSS): http://www.zimbra.com/downloads Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Breen" <marklbreen at gmail.com> To: "Discussion of Hardware and Software issues" <dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Thursday, 11 September, 2014 3:12:01 AM Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Outlook 365 Hello Gustav, I have mostly used google apps since 2006, however, some clients just love outlook. I am a big fan of not tying ourselves to the desktop, and when I have a client that wants to use outlook with Gmail, I hate it. As a result of that frustration, I have been looking a bit more at office365 and I agree with you, the outlook web client is great. I wonder whether a poweruser of outlook desktop would say the same. It is an interesting option instead of google. BTW, did you notice that if you only want email from Office365, the cost is only about €3.5 per month. This is almost free. Even with 40 employees, it is still very cheap for what you get. Hard to make a case for Google mail unless they really do not want Microsoft. Mark On 11 September 2014 07:57, Gustav Brock <gustav at cactus.dk> wrote: > Hi all > > Most daily feedback you get from clients is about issues, troubles, > non-behaving programs and so on. > > We have several clients running Office 365. Most of them we planned to > offer a traditional local Outlook 2013 installation. > However, I have now two positive and unsolicited calls from clients to > tell, that they are so happy with the web interface, that they will refrain > from the local Outlook 2010/2013 installation. > > At work, I have Outlook 2013 installed, but I'm lazy and I wanted to > familiarize with the web interface, so at home I only use the web > interface. I haven't thought so much about it, but evaluating it now, I > have to admit that it works so well that I don't miss the local install at > home. > > Like many others, I'm a bit sceptic about "the cloud is everything" > because quite often the web interface is missing something. But the Outlook > interface demonstrates that it can be done. Food for thought. > > /gustav > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com