[dba-Tech] Wanna Cry/WannaCrypt

Wed May 24 12:06:39 CDT 2017

Hi All:

If there was ever a battle between the two OS leaders Linux and Microsoft, it is over. Microsoft loves Linux and so it is a matter of the users choosing between Linux and Microsoft-Linux.

My point was to fix a network's infrastructure first and the wannacry worm, regardless of your choice of OS, would have been a non-issue.

The graph you linked to was interesting. It should be noted that it was Microsoft servers that were shown as less vulnerable to infection and if they weren't, we shouldn't be using them. OTOH, I like using servers as Desktop machines...much more flexible. ;-) 

Jim 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gustav Brock" <gustav at cactus.dk>
To: "Discussion of Hardware and Software issues" <dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:55:13 AM
Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Wanna Cry/WannaCrypt

Hi John (and Jim)

That was my thought as well. There may be reasons to switch to Linux desktop (with all respect, I have yet to find one), but WannaCry is not among these. 

If you've seen Kaspersky's graph on infected systems, about 98% is Windows 7 and the rest is Windows Server 2008:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/over-98-percent-of-all-wannacry-victims-were-using-windows-7/

So, if you should draw any conclusion, it should be to upgrade from Windows 7 and 2008.
But again, that only counts for not updated systems.

/gustav

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: dba-Tech [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] På vegne af John R Bartow
Sendt: 24. maj 2017 00:11
Til: 'Discussion of Hardware and Software issues' <dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com>
Emne: Re: [dba-Tech] Wanna Cry/WannaCrypt
Prioritet: Høj

Lol, I knew that eventually you work this around to suggesting everyone use Linux.

The fact is Wannacry was not a threat to people who upgrade and apply patches on a regular basis. You didn't see any big warnings about it from me did you? When a hack is released to the public - it's not only the black hats that should be taking note, the white hats should be too. I have a good group of white hats in my corner and my security had this vulnerability covered a month before the black hats took advantage of it - even on unpatched XP systems. 

So the questions Wannacry raised are: Do you patch? Do you know why you're patching? Do you have proper, multi level security? And, as you mentioned, do you have proper offline backups. 

So nothing new here. Just common sense that applies to ALL computers, Windows or not.

Nice try at trying to recruit more penguins though ;-) -----Original Message-----
From: dba-Tech [mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Lawrence
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 1:07 PM
To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues
Subject: [dba-Tech] Wanna Cry/WannaCrypt

Hi All:

The is a rather late comment on the Wannacry worm that spread around the planet. 

<rant mode on>
People have been quick to blame Microsoft for their hacked systems when the problem could have been easily blocked and recovered from by just using the most basic steps. I personally find it amazing that even though PCs have been around for a generation, few seem grasp the basics of planning for failure. Failure of your system is guaranteed. Consider your computer like a light bulb...all fail eventually and if you career or business depends on your data, plan for system failure one way or the other. The Wannacry worm was a wake up call.

Aside: I strong disagree with the creation and storage of hidden system vulnerabilities. Not matter how well hidden they always get out and if not, when used, they are like a gas attack. It takes a wary opponent hours to reciprocate and because of our highly technical society we end up getting hammered to pieces, far worse. Can you imagine what would have happened if after Japan was nuked, within hours, Japan was nuking the west coast, in retaliation?  
</rant mode off>

XP was really not the problem as how could anyone expect a ancient system to not be easily hackable? The real problem is that of how the system's routers were setup. To start with, secure mode should always be set, on the router.
This mode shuts down every port except port 80 unless specifically requested by the user and that requires a manual entry. The hack, passed through the router, using port 139, that was used by NetBIOS and in conjunction with port 445, for direct TCP/IP SMB. No one uses these ports anymore so they should be turned off. Even as far back as 1995, when install Windows 3.1 workgroup, Microsoft was recommending not using applications that required these ports. If you want to check to see if these ports are open on your router or network, browse to one of many external port checkers. I use the following online app as it is generic and works on everything:

http://www.yougetsignal.com/tools/open-ports/

When arriving on the opening screen find and click on the button, on the right saying "Scan all common ports". If ports 139 and 445 show up as open turn them off through your router.

Backup are the essential for every PC that has data that is worth anything.
The MAC has an excellent, fully automated system called the timemachine, that initialises with a hard-drive image and then does a regular/continuous backup of all changed files. Linux has many excellent backup systems...a package called Cronopete emulates the features of the Apple Timemachine.
Both these products allow your system, from a hard down, to operational within an hour. MS Windows may have something similar, I don't know...all I can say is they didn't use to.

I don't want to make the following appear as a rant against Microsoft but there are some major faults in Window design. Its greatest strength and weakness is it backward compatibility. With that compatibility comes an inability to sand-box or isolate a process, a user or application. That is just the way it is designed from the ground up and the cost of rebuilding millions of lines of ancient of code is prohibitive. I am pleased to see Microsoft is adopting more and more Linux modules. At one time, in the future, in may just become another flavour of Linux. In the meantime, while MS is going through this migration process, I just use Linux. Linux is also great for walling in and protecting your Windows servers as Linux is much better at being front facing. Linux today, runs most of the best routers (ie. Cisco) but not all are expensive and many older routers can be upgraded using products like OpenWrt, pfSense, OpenVPN to name but a few industry standards. (They are also OSS!
 .)

One last comment on Windows and Linux comes from TechRepublic. A quote from the article goes as follows; "The important question here is this: Have there been any ransomware attacks on the Linux desktop? The answer is no.
With that in mind, it's pretty easy to draw the conclusion that now would be a great time to start deploying Linux on the desktop.":

http://www.techrepublic.com/article/wannacrypt-makes-an-easy-case-for-linux/

Jim    

_______________________________________________
dba-Tech mailing list
dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com