Jack and Pat
drawbridgej at sympatico.ca
Tue Sep 22 11:35:40 CDT 2009
My initial thought was bit fields also, until I saw boat_length and income
identified by ranges.
-----Original Message-----
From: dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 12:31 PM
To: Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related programming issues.
Subject: Re: [dba-VB] Merge rows
This is an idea worthy of consideration. The problem is translating the
client's original field
name to a bit in the bit field when he sends me an order.
The client has a spreadsheet of these fields and sends me orders with the
field names (or more often
a "record number" in the spreadsheet). I look down through the spreadsheet
to find the record
number, translate that to the field name, then drop that field name into the
where clause of a query.
It would be fascinating to have an already translated bit map of these
fields, and able to do these
kinds of where clauses. It would end up being Where (Bit37 AND Bit44 AND
Bit69) OR (BIT190 OR
Bit191) etc.
Not exactly readable, but I have to assume that it would be much faster. It
would make me seriously
nervous though that I actually got the right bits. As it is now it is
"plain English", you can read
the field names from the SQL statement. I would definitely have to have a
well tested tool that
performed the bit lookup and wrote the where().
Can you index bits? If not you would turn the actual query into a ton of
table scans, though as you
mention the size of the table would shrink dramatically. It might actually
be possible to get the
entire table into memory if each field (that contained just 'Y' values) was
a single bit.
John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com
Shamil Salakhetdinov wrote:
> <<<
> Think ("Hispanic" AND (income >50K) AND (Has Kids)) AND ((HasDog OR
HASCat)
> OR ...)
> ...
> The entire point is to make the process faster and faster and faster.
> John,
>
> If you have many [has Kids], [HasCat], [HasDog] kind of fields you can
> consider combining them into bit array fields, for predefined range values
> you can make say half-byte groups bit array fields values... by thus
> minimizing the size of your table record...
>
> --Shamil
_______________________________________________
dba-VB mailing list
dba-VB at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-vb
http://www.databaseadvisors.com