[dba-VB] Recent Discussion from MS on VB.Net and C# in VS 2010

Likewise, ATM.  However unlike you I am still young enough that I probably will eventually.  It is 
best for me to prepare.

In the end C# has not been so bad.  Yes, VB would have been easier but not enough so to lose 
potential clients (or sleep) over.

John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com


Charlotte Foust wrote:
> But one big difference is that the code isn't what the user uses!  It's the compiled code and that is in CLR no matter what language you use to develop it.  Thank goodness I don't have to pander to IT departments who know nothing about development but are convinced that one language is better than another!!
> 
> Charlotte Foust
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of David McAfee
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 5:04 PM
> To: dwaters at usinternet.com; Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related programming issues.
> Subject: Re: [dba-VB] Recent Discussion from MS on VB.Net and C# in VS 2010
> 
> I made the mistake of thinking that too, and unfortunately, I was wrong.
> 
> C# is way more popular and sought after, at least in my neck of the woods.
> 
> I've done some stuff in C#, and always make the mistake of "pumping"
> something out in VB.Net because I'm faster at it.
> 
> I need to stop thinking that way.
> 
> It's like when I started writing TSQL, breaking myself of the habit of
> using the GUI.
> 
> I'm so glad I finally did!
> 
> D
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dba-VB mailing list
> dba-VB at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-vb
> http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
>