[dba-VB] Recent Discussion from MS on VB.Net and C# in VS 2010

Yeah, but only if you are a dim wit and think that the  great being in the
sky is leaning down to help you.

Two helping hands to deliver  you into obscurity and confusion more like it.

Max
 

-----Original Message-----
From: dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Shamil
Salakhetdinov
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 6:38 AM
To: dwaters at usinternet.com; 'Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related
programming issues.'
Subject: Re: [dba-VB] Recent Discussion from MS on VB.Net and C# in VS 2010

Hi Dan --

You can imagine curly braces as being two open helping hands - 

- left - 

{ 

and

- right - 

}

:)

If you're only starting using VB.NET then try C# instead - you'll never look
back...

I have been programming fluently on VB(A) for 10+ years (and before that I
have used (macro) Assemblers, FORTRAN, PL/1, COBOL, PASCAL, C/C++ etc. in
many projects) - VB(A) and VB.NET look so "weird" for me now...

Thank you.

--
Shamil

-----Original Message-----
From: dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:45 AM
To: 'Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related programming issues.'
Subject: Re: [dba-VB] Recent Discussion from MS on VB.Net and C# in VS 2010

Hi Shamil,

Well - I'm just getting started with VB.  I think those curly braces are
weird and off putting!

I do believe that VB.Net will be preferred over time - all other things
being equal the easy path is the one more trodden!

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:dba-vb-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Shamil
Salakhetdinov
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 3:52 PM
To: 'Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related programming issues.'
Subject: Re: [dba-VB] Recent Discussion from MS on VB.Net and C# in VS 2010

Hi Dan --

<<<
...because it's easier to read...
>>>
Well what of the following code lines is easier to read/understand/code for
a (beginner) programmer?:

string line = "test";

or

dim line as string = "test"

IMO (just IMO) defining a string variable named 'line' with initial value
equal to "test" is directly translated to C#'s code line:

string line = "test";

but not to a VB.NET one...

And there could be found many samples like that one above, more complicated
samples, which will highlight "one-to-one" correspondence between C# coding
and algorithmic specifications...

IMO (just IMO, I'm not trying to start a discussion here) C# is more
straightforward and laconic, and is expected to become "preferred"
programming language over time...

Thank you :)

--
Shamil

<<<snip >>>


_______________________________________________
dba-VB mailing list
dba-VB at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-vb
http://www.databaseadvisors.com