Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Apr 10 05:04:12 CDT 2003
Hi Liz Interesting. Out of curiosity, could you get from Bill which printer driver didn't work and which did? Also, for Bill, remember that and old proven LaserJet printer driver will print to most of the new fancy models but, of course, only with the features of the old driver. Quite often an old driver, native to Windows, prints faster. /gustav > Thanks, everyone for your ideas. I've just gotten an update from Bill: > Out of desperation and fear of the client, Bill tried setting the default to > another printer--not the client's preferred one, but just any one, to see if > any other difference could be made. And it worked! So from what you all > have said, XP didn't like the driver for the original printer as well as it > likes the driver for this one. Unfortunately, the client must now choose > his preferred printer each time he prints, but he appears to be OK with > that. > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of William Hindman > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 2:24 PM > To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Printing in Access 2002 > ...having just gone through a week long exercise with a brand new $18K > Minolta Printer/Copier at a client, I can vouchsafe that lots of XP drivers > are buggy ... had to actually install a W2K laptop and print from it to get > critical work out the door ...the only thing that I can tell you is that if > the printer driver is missing the MS Certified for Windows XP logo there is > probably a reason for it besides the cost :(((((((