Andy Lacey
andy at minstersystems.co.uk
Wed Apr 23 09:56:35 CDT 2003
FWIW Lotus 123 was one of the earliest (first I used anyway) PC products to use macros. And yes you could record them but that definitely wasn't the definition of macro because you could add simple logic such as goto's or menu statements and they were certainly still macros. It was just a mini programming language. Excel started the same way, and then Word. Their programming capability has increased but ok they still use the word macro. I don't believe you can limit macro to something recorded and then say anything else is a procedure. What do you get if you use the record capability then modify the code, say by a single instruction? What do you have if you enter code through the keyboard which is the same as what you might have recorded? I can't see that it works as a differentiator. Andy Lacey http://www.minstersystems.co.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of > Bryan Carbonnell > Sent: 23 April 2003 10:47 > To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com > Subject: Re: [AccessD] VBA question > > > On 22 Apr 2003 at 23:53, William Hindman wrote: > > > ...don't agree Bryan ...macro in the Microsoft context has always > > OK well how about we agree to disagree? > > To me the terms macro is valid and accurate when programming in Word > or Excel. To you it's not accurate. I personally don't like the > connotation associated so I try my best not to use it, but that's > just me. > > -- > Bryan Carbonnell - carbonnb at sympatico.ca > The man who claims to be the boss in his own home will lie about > other things as well. _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/a> ccessd > Website: > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >