Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Sat Dec 13 06:01:40 CST 2003
Hi Andy I see. But my idea wouldn't work if the sales person was visiting several clients per day - except if all customers were scrambled and he brings a list telling which real customer, say, "McAllen & Daughters Ltd." represents. /gustav > Not sure what you mean by "mixed up" Gustav. Take one of many screens. Here > you can select a financial period and year; select a customer or a customer > group or leave blank for all customers, hit Print and a report will show the > orders for those criteria, a summary of expenditure, render it into GBP if > it was export and so on. And that's just one of many, many examples. Now the > pitfalls are that a) the sales person may/will drop down the combo to choose > the customer, thereby showing other customers or b) may inadvertently select > the wrong customer and print the report (and hand it over to his client > before he realises his mistake - aargh!) or c) hit Print without selecting a > customer and therefore list activity for all customers. This is the sort of > thing I'm talking about. And as I stressed right from the start there are > oodles of such situations in the system so attacking each one individually > is not an option. > At the moment I like your idea Gustav of deliberately "corrupting" the rest > of the data so that it's there but unrecognisable. If I did that to selected > fields (names, addresses, phone nos, email addresses and so - not too many I > don't think) I think that would do nicely. I guess I could even do it by > encryption so that it's reversible. That way my on-the-road salesperson > could "corrupt" all but one customer, then un-corrupt all after first > meeting and re-corrupt all but a second customer when they get to the next > place. > -- > Andy Lacey > http://www.minstersystems.co.uk > --------- Original Message -------- > From: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Sort of like a filter only not > Date: 12/12/03 13:44 > Hi Andy > Hmmm ... but why are the data initially mixed up?