Dan Waters
dwaters at usinternet.com
Wed Feb 26 08:55:01 CST 2003
Charlotte - Here is something to be aware of. Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 810415 Access 2002 Format Database Bloat Is Not Stopped by Compacting http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810415 The KB article describes a system table in XP that is not compacted when it should be. Microsoft confirms that this is a problem and they recommend developing using the 2000 format when you can. I was developing an ~ 15 Mb database in 2002 format, but it bloated to 3 - 4 times this size, and decompiling/compacting didn't shrink it. I moved all the objects to a 2000 db file, and then was able to get it back down to the normal size. Dan Waters -----Original Message----- From: accessd-admin at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-admin at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:38 PM To: AccessD at databaseadvisors.com Subject: [AccessD] Access 2002 database format Does anyone know of reasons to chose the 2002 format over the default 2000 format, or vice versa, in AXP? I can't think of any reason except to be able to create an mde, which we can't do with our app anyhow because of the design changes it makes to itself at runtime. Charlotte Foust -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://databaseadvisors.com/pipermail/accessd/attachments/20030226/a9ae6553/attachment-0001.html>