Arthur Fuller
artful at rogers.com
Tue Jul 8 11:20:31 CDT 2003
The following excerpt comes from http://www.vbcity.com/forums/faq.asp?fid=30&cat=General&#TID30570. If the subject interests you, I suggest you visit there. Here is a preview: <article> What are coding standards? Coding Standards can relate to all areas of programming. In this FAQ we are concerned with trying to convey information about an object by using a naming convention. Naming your objects in a predefined way means you can tell more about an object purely by the way it is named. Lets take a standard Looping variable. If I call my variable 'X' it is not obvious what it does :- Code:For X = 0 to 10 ... Next X If we change the name of 'X' it becomes obvious what it is doing :- Code:For Index = 0 To 10 ... End Index Although 'X' is quicker to type, it is unclear what it is doing. This becomes more obvious when we have loops in loops:- Code:For X=0 to 10 For Z=0 to 100 ... Next Z Next X For ParentIndex = 0 To 10 For ChildIndex = 0 To 100 ... End ChildIndex End ParentIndex The second version is a lot clearer and explains what is happening in the loops purely by using 'Explanatory Names'. You may be tempted to save typing by using Letters or short names. Resist this temptation and Cut and Paste the name while using it. </article> This does not apply to Access, except in narrow areas like creation of types or classes, but it's an interesting point nonetheless. Like many other listers, I have habitually created all my variables with type-prefixes. Given intellisense, this may be obsolete. What do you think?