Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Tue Jul 8 04:33:46 CDT 2003
Hi Joe and Mark > Addionally, I would suggest that you build the BE in MSDE / SQL Server. >> IMO, for rock-solid reliability you should choose VB and install the EXE >> as a Windows service. .. I think everyone here, including Joe, are forgetting the preconditions. Next suggestion would probably be that this tiny app should run on mirrored high-end dual processor servers with raid 10 disk arrays with hot spares, backup power supplies and fallback interconnection and backed by dual diesel powered UPSs - just in case. Think about it. This app is not a vital part for the control center of a nuclear plant, it is even not for logging emergency calls of a phone system - it is for capturing a log output or converting log files. In other words: should this app, for whatever reason, halt, nothing will happen. Restart (or recover) the system and it will continue as if nothing had happened. Jet since version 2.0 is probably one of the most stable outcomes from Redmond. Thus, this system of Joe's could safely run on an old P/II machine with 64 MB and Win98 or WinNT for months; if you add a self rebooting routine to initiate Sunday night, it would probably run "forever". Create a mirror of the harddisk on a spare harddisk and keep this in a safe place ready for exchange and you are all set. /gustav >> I am going to be creating an application that parses the output from our >> telephone system and log it into an Access database. This application will >> be running on a server so that it can be up 24/7. What I was wonder is if >> an >> Access FE app will be OK running 24/7? Would I be better off creating the >> FE >> in VB instead? I think that it would be easier to get the data into the >> database if I use Access as the FE but I am more concerned with >> reliability.