Wortz, Charles
CWortz at tea.state.tx.us
Wed Jun 4 08:05:27 CDT 2003
Marcel, Since relationships are between and among tables, and since the tables reside in the BE, why do you think the relationships should be in the FE and not the BE? Also, I do not understand your so-called advantages? Please explain. Charles Wortz Software Development Division Texas Education Agency 1701 N. Congress Ave Austin, TX 78701-1494 512-463-9493 CWortz at tea.state.tx.us -----Original Message----- From: Marcel Vreuls [mailto:marcel.vreuls at oop.nl] Sent: Wednesday 2003 Jun 04 07:57 To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: [AccessD] relations in which database Dear group, I am stugling with the following. In our current situation I have a FE and a BE database. The relationships are currently stored in the BE database. Now the question is why not put them in the FE database and just leave the plain tables in the be database. Advantages should be - performance in multiuser env. - more control over the database because with each update you can change, add a relationship - peoplo who want to access the database through excel, and so on have more trouble in comprending the database. - field updates, new tables are easily to create instead of using 3rd party backend updaters Are there disadvantages??? Thanks, marcel vreuls