Susan Harkins
harkins at iglou.com
Fri Mar 14 11:38:17 CST 2003
Chris, the back-end will be in SQL Server regardless? Let him talk to Martin -- he'll straighten this guy out. :) Seriously. If the above isn't the case and the mdb would be inclusive of Access tables, we probably don't have enough information to really discern which is the best solution. Although, I think people that already have SQL Server tend to go that route regardless, unless they're creating a smaller application and just don't want to put the development and administrative resources into the project. Susan H. > I am trying to convince a client that's rebuilding a DOS based system with > SQL Server 2000 and Access XP that the .adp format is superior to the .mdb > format for working with SQL Server back ends. Does anyone have any articles > or any "objective" materials that I could show to them? (Another developer > has them convinced that the .mdb format is the way to go)