[AccessD] ADP vs. MDB for SQL 2000

If they are already using SQL
Server I would go Access XP and ADPs.

Susan H.


> I didnt say that I said
>
>
>  Whats the application? How many users? etc all the usual stuff.
> Choice depends on a lot of things. Does the customer need the power of SQL
> Server right now or will they need it very soon? If they are already using
SQL
> Server I would go Access XP and ADPs.
>
> If I have to develop an interface to SQL Server Its an ADP.
>
> End of day it has to be the right tool for the job.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> > I don't necessarily agree with Martin -- just because you have SQL
> > Server
> > isn't a good reason to go .adp, BUT if you have all the pieces and it's
> > just
> > a question of choice, why not?
> >
> > Susan H.
> >
> >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > Whats the application? How many users? etc all the usual stuff.
> > Choice
> > depends
> > > on a lot of things. Does the customer need the power of SQL Server
> > right
> > now
> > > or will they need it very soon? If they are already using SQL Server
> > I
> > would
> > > go Access XP and ADPs.
> > >
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > AccessD mailing list
> > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>