John Colby
jcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Sun Nov 2 07:53:42 CST 2003
I have a client running about 25 Access FEs against an MDB BE. He has a single server, and of course must use a single server at least for the BE if we don't get into replication. The server is Windows NT, not even 2K. He just expanded into another wing of the building they rent and are going to move one unit of the business (and database) into that wing. Can he run multiple NICS in Windows NT? That would allow him to put a switch (or router) on what would essentially be two different LANs. They don't really have any inter workstation traffic so this would probably work if NT can deal with more than one NIC. I know that they have (or had) bandwidth issues because when they replaced a hub with a switch awhile back the performance of the db improved. John W. Colby www.colbyconsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Erwin Craps Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 3:36 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: Wireless network (sort of) The weakest link in a network will decide the bandwith. If you only have one server all trafic goes to and comes from one link. If that link is the same speed as the clients link a switch is of no use. You gonna have a bottleneck. Again, switch are very good but you must have a different server speed link OR multiple servers. By that your bandwith gets divided over multiple or higer speed links. Switches are useles (for reaons of speed) in a single server and only 1 speed link. It's a basic rule of a switch!!! Erwin