[AccessD] How to prevent a mess

David Emerson davide at dalyn.co.nz
Mon Nov 3 12:14:50 CST 2003


Have you considered indirect synchronization.  Basically the remote users 
have dropboxes set up on the server.  They dial into the server and do 
their synchronization when they are ready.  Check out the replication white 
papers etc for information.  Here is a list of some resources for A97 (not 
sure if the links still work).  Updated copies of most of them are 
available for A2K and A02 -

Building Applications with Microsoft Access 97

Access 97 Developers Handbook (Litwin, Getz, Gilbert)

Database Replication in Microsoft Jet (Tony Poll - Microsoft Replication 
White Paper)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q164553

Microsoft Jet Database Replication (Peter Bateman, Bruce Schatzman)

Microsoft Access 97 Replication Site
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/access/content/repl/replication.asp

Internet Synchronization with Microsoft Jet 3.5 (Michael Wachal)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q181371

Search for replication here
http://msdn.microsoft.com/default.asp

Microsoft Knowledgebase

Regards

David Emerson
Dalyn Software Ltd
25 Cunliffe St, Johnsonville
Wellington, New Zealand
Ph/Fax (877) 456-1205


At 3/11/2003, you wrote:
>Dear Group,
>
>I've been enlightened by Michael Kaplan's explanation of the perils of 
>copying replicas and not going through a proper replication sequence with 
>CD copies back and forth.
>
>The question is: what now? The independent laptops are scattered around 
>the state and its *very* inconvenient for them to come back to do a 
>physical replication. Money to write a custom synchronization process is 
>simply not available.
>
>I note from Kaplan's explanations that if the replicas are unmanaged -- 
>that is, Synchronizer is not used -- then certain types of problems can be 
>avoided. Also problems can be avoided by using the built-in Access methods 
>for moving replicas or by using TSI Synchronizer.
>
>He also mentions using the Briefcase reconciler, but that doesn't exist in 
>Windows 2000 or XP, does it?
>
>I'm trying to avoid creating a mess. The application is in more or less a 
>beta stage now, so we could start from scratch with a new Replication 
>strategy. Any advice?
>
>Regards,
>
>Steve Erbach
>Scientific Marketing
>Neenah, WI
>
>_______________________________________________
>AccessD mailing list
>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list