[AccessD] Archive Ooops....

John Bartow john at winhaven.net
Wed Nov 26 16:02:46 CST 2003


Sounds like a non-word to me!

If you know what mean.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Drew Wutka
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: RE: [AccessD] Archive Ooops....
>
>
> Hehehe.  I know.  It's a two step process.  My print server has
> the Archiver
> service, which logs into our mailserver (at work here) through a
> VPN, looks
> for new messages (in the normal folder and an archive folder), it
> then dumps
> the new mail into the database, and marks them as archived (by setting a
> subject).  That runs every 2 hours.  Sort of.  I have something
> running for
> Mike Mattys that is run through that process, and if it kicks off, it can
> take an hour or two before the archiving actually occurs.  The second
> process is the indexer (which is what indexes the memo fields that the
> messages are stored in.).  That indexer runs on my main server, and runs
> every hour, but only indexes 200 messages at a time. (Because it
> takes about
> 10 to 20 minutes to index 200 messages, and I didn't want the
> indexer to hog
> the server).
>
> What actually happened was for some reason, I set the index
> tables to have a
> max field size of 100 on the word tables.  Someone posted a word over that
> limit, cause it was erroring by saying that the data was too big for the
> field.  So yesterday, I set the field limit to 255 on all the
> index tables,
> and kicked off the indexer service again.  Why I set it to 100, I don't
> know.  It doesn't really matter, cause Access doesn't take up
> extra space, I
> guess I just thought there would never be a word bigger then 100
> characters.
> Now that I think about it, I wonder what word caused the problem! <grin>
>
> Drew
>




More information about the AccessD mailing list