John Bartow
john at winhaven.net
Wed Nov 26 16:02:46 CST 2003
Sounds like a non-word to me! If you know what mean. > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Drew Wutka > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:49 PM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: RE: [AccessD] Archive Ooops.... > > > Hehehe. I know. It's a two step process. My print server has > the Archiver > service, which logs into our mailserver (at work here) through a > VPN, looks > for new messages (in the normal folder and an archive folder), it > then dumps > the new mail into the database, and marks them as archived (by setting a > subject). That runs every 2 hours. Sort of. I have something > running for > Mike Mattys that is run through that process, and if it kicks off, it can > take an hour or two before the archiving actually occurs. The second > process is the indexer (which is what indexes the memo fields that the > messages are stored in.). That indexer runs on my main server, and runs > every hour, but only indexes 200 messages at a time. (Because it > takes about > 10 to 20 minutes to index 200 messages, and I didn't want the > indexer to hog > the server). > > What actually happened was for some reason, I set the index > tables to have a > max field size of 100 on the word tables. Someone posted a word over that > limit, cause it was erroring by saying that the data was too big for the > field. So yesterday, I set the field limit to 255 on all the > index tables, > and kicked off the indexer service again. Why I set it to 100, I don't > know. It doesn't really matter, cause Access doesn't take up > extra space, I > guess I just thought there would never be a word bigger then 100 > characters. > Now that I think about it, I wonder what word caused the problem! <grin> > > Drew >