[AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?

Charlotte Foust cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Tue Aug 17 16:43:34 CDT 2004


I'm not using 2003.  I still stick with 2002, 2000 and 97.  I'll need to
add 2003 eventually just to stay current, but I see no reason to upgrade
my entire Office.

Charlotte Foust


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Hewson [mailto:JHewson at karta.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:34 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?


Thanks.
Are you using the 2000 format with 2003?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Charlotte
Foust
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:17 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?


I understand that the bloat problem is still around in 2003, but I can't
tell you that from experience.  Most of the developers I know world-wide
are still using 2000 or 2002.

Charlotte Foust


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Hewson [mailto:JHewson at karta.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 12:32 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?



What did the service pack fix?
Does 2003 have any major problems?
Some folks on this list mentioned that when developing in XP they use
A2K file format because of the bloat problem.  Is there any such problem
with 2003?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Charlotte
Foust
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:03 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?


Yeah, but 2003 got a service pack within months .... Does that suggest
how badly it needed that SP?? <VBG> 

Charlotte Foust


-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Barabash [mailto:BBarabash at tappeconstruction.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:55 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?


Ooh you forgot one:
6) That spiffy dancing paper clip is absent from Access 2.

We waited forever to upgrade our Access 2 apps, and even then we didn't
upgrade to the newest version (2000 instead of XP).  It normally takes
at least a year until a service pack fixes the critical bugs introduced
with each new version.

And I concur with Gustav.  Our remaining 2.0 apps run just as well on
Windows XP (and they are immune from any 32-bit library upgrades that
tend to break office applications).


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Francisco H
Tapia
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:40 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS?

Gustav Brock wrote On 8/17/2004 11:19 AM:

>Hi Catherine
>
>As long as you don't see a compelling reason to do so, the short answer

>is No.
>
>Even Access 2.0 (16 bit) runs nicely under Windows XP.
>  
>
Reason's to upgrade your copy of Access:

1) You like to donate to the help out the billionaire campaign
2) You're running Ms Access 95
3) You absolutely sleep better at night knowing all your software uses
Activation Keys.
4) That $400 is burning a hole in your pocket.
5) and the final reason to upgrade your copy of Access is:
   You dig the latest splash screen in the latest copy of Access.

I can think of more reasons NOT to upgrade

--
-Francisco

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
The information in this email may contain confidential information that 
is legally privileged. The information is only for the use of the
intended 
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you 
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the
taking 
of any action in regard to the content of this email is strictly
prohibited.  If 
transmission is incorrect, unclear, or incomplete, please notify the
sender 
immediately. The authorized recipient(s) of this information is/are
prohibited 
from disclosing this information to any other party and is/are required
to 
destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be
the views of Tappe Construction Co.

This footer also confirms that this email message has been scanned for
the presence of computer viruses.Scanning of this message and addition
of this footer is performed by SurfControl E-mail Filter software in
conjunction with virus detection software.

-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list