Dan Waters
dwaters at usinternet.com
Tue Aug 17 18:31:57 CDT 2004
Catherine, If Access 95 is being used, upgrade right away. Access 97 was much more reliable. Access 2000 includes a 'compact on close' option that is pretty useful where people can't (or won't) compact regularly. Access 2002 includes a Me.OpenArgs property for reports that is really nice to program with. If you end up using A02 or A03, keep the database in A00 format. There is a bug in A02 and A03 that can bloat the database if the format is not left in A00. BTW, if you can get a copy of the Access 2002 Developer's Handbook, it has a good description of the changes that occurred from Access 2.0 to Access 2002. Also, what is the belief that a newer version of Access will run better on their upgraded machines? ANY version of Access will run better on ANY upgraded machine. Best of Luck! Dan -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Catherine Blansett Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:05 PM To: AccessD at databaseadvisors.com Subject: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS? Hi, I know that we have addressed this subject in the past. I just wanted to make sure I am up to date. I have a client that has a fully functional database program for her non-profit agency (front-end and back-end). She is receiving pressure to upgrade to the newest version of ACCESS so that it will work better with their upgraded machines. I have told her there is no reason to do this. Is there any reason to move? Thanks Catherine -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com