Catherine Blansett
blansett at holly.colostate.edu
Tue Aug 17 19:25:02 CDT 2004
The application is in 97. ----- Original Message ----- From: <DWUTKA at marlow.com> To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 3:24 PM Subject: RE: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS? > Just out of curiousity, what version is the application in? > > I never used 2.0, but as many listers have posted, it's rock solid. 95 was > horribly flaky, but 97 is as solid as it gets. I don't think they've > improved on 97's performance at all (at least I haven't heard of any > performance increases). > > Sounds like there is a different reason to push an upgrade, other then this > Access App. > > In fact, Access applications are one of the largest tasks involved in an > upgrade. Our company still uses Office 97 on all of it's 150+ work > stations. There are newer versions of Outlook on some machines, but that's > it. We do plan on eventually upgrading to a newer version of Office, when > the budget allows. Two issues we will be concerned with, at that time, is > getting it installed network wide, and ensuring all of our .mdb's are > working. There are not many 'coded' .mdb's on the network, mostly > querries/reports. 95% of the stuff I have done either have VB or ASP front > ends, so an upgrade won't affect them. > > Drew > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Catherine > Blansett > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:05 PM > To: AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > Subject: [AccessD] Changing to newest version of ACCESS? > > > Hi, > > I know that we have addressed this subject in the past. I just wanted to > make sure I am up to date. I have a client that has a fully functional > database program for her non-profit agency (front-end and back-end). She is > receiving pressure to upgrade to the newest version of ACCESS so that it > will work better with their upgraded machines. I have told her there is no > reason to do this. > > Is there any reason to move? > > Thanks > > Catherine > > -- > _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- > _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com