Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Sat Jul 16 00:12:20 CDT 2005
Hi Stuart: I must say that agree with Arthur on this approach. The ADO connection layer allows so much flexibility when writing Access applications. Most of my clients initially started out with small applications but as they grew they always moved to a MS SQL or Oracle backend. If I had written the program in DAO it would have been a huge and expensive re-write. Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 3:57 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: RE: [AccessD] Reporting field properties On 15 Jul 2005 at 10:38, John W. Colby wrote: > That's what I thought. In cases like this it is useful to be able to get at > the physical layer. DAO is occasionally still useful. > Ocassionally? If you are working with Jet(using Access as your data store) I don't know a single advantage of ADO over DAO. I do know several advantages DAO has over ADO. I use ADO in VB regularly, but every time I create a new Access application, the first thing I do is remove the ADO reference and replace it with a reference to DAO :-) -- Stuart -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com