[AccessD] Another word question...

Bobby Heid bheid at appdevgrp.com
Fri Jul 22 12:58:12 CDT 2005


Well, in my particular case, the table variable may not be there.  In that
case, the users do not want a table to show.

I initially started out with a predefined table.  But from what I read, it
is very slow to add rows to an existing table.

When I create the table, I have an object variable pointing at the table.
SO maybe you could identify the table in code and delete it if you did not
want it?

Bobby


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Arthur Fuller
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:25 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Another word question...


After looking through your code and playing a bit with it, I'm wondering
whether I can work backwards, sort of. Assume that my template contains a
table with a header row and one blank row, already formatted to the size and
font etc. that I want in the populated result. Would I need to specify these
when adding rows, or is that already done, given the existence of the table
header and blank row? Failing that, can I deduce the column widths etc. from
the existing header and blank row? What's the best way to go about this?
Start with a 1-row table (plus header), or manufacture the whole table as
you apparently do?

It's possible, in the document I need to create, that one of the tables will
contain zero rows (it would always be Table Two). This occurs rarely but I
need to be able to deal with it. Assuming (as now) that the table exists in
the template file, how would I hide it in the event that it contains zero
rows of data?

Thanks!

Arthur




More information about the AccessD mailing list