William Hindman
wdhindman at bellsouth.net
Fri Nov 18 09:54:16 CST 2005
...just call me Dinosaurus Rex :) Willam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Erbach" <erbachs at gmail.com> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:48 AM Subject: Re: [AccessD] A2K3 ADP > William, > > Following on to John's other question about connecting to SQL Server, are > you saying that when connecting to SQL Server data sources (for the time > being, anyway) you're relying on ODBC and DAO 3.6 in MDB's? Very > interesting. Pass-through queries and all? > > Steve Erbach > Neenah, WI > > On 11/16/05, William Hindman <wdhindman at bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >> ...I dropped any work with ADPs when MS made it clear they weren't the >> future ...had enough learning on my pallet as it was ...not that I was >> happy >> with the performance I got with an ADP anyway ...I'm pure DAO 3.6 for the >> moment and doing just fine :) >> >> William >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "John Bartow" <john at winhaven.net> >> To: "_DBA-Access" <AccessD at databaseadvisors.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 12:52 PM >> Subject: [AccessD] A2K3 ADP >> >> >> > Does anyone have comments on ADPs with A2K3? >> > >> > IIRC there were some negatives brought up about them here with previous >> > versions. >> > >> > Are you using ADPs for SQLServer data sources or MDBs via DB >> connectivity? >> > >> > TIA >> > John B. >> > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >