Steve Erbach
erbachs at gmail.com
Fri Nov 18 12:19:26 CST 2005
Robert, I'm not concerned about coding something like this. I'm more interested in the state of Microsoft development and support. I have a Universal MSDN subscription, but I confess I don't pay that much attention to what's happening with Access. It just seemed to me that ADP's were so handy. Steve Erbach Neenah, WI On 11/18/05, Robert L. Stewart <rl_stewart at highstream.net> wrote: > > Not really, since Microsoft is not going to continue support of > ADPs. All those using them will have to re-tool their applications. > > I have some massive MDBs that connect only to SLQ Server, using > ODBC. I was going to rewrite them to ADPs, but when I heard they > were not going to be supported, I stopped. I am rewriting them in > .Net instead. > > And, stored procs work fine using ODBC, just use a pass through > query. Normally, I have one without the parameters (_0) that I use > to build the one with the parameters (_1). And I simply change the > SQL statement in code for the _1 query. If you are worried about the > connection string, simply replace it through code also. > > Robert > > At 10:11 AM 11/18/2005, you wrote: > >Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:54:16 -0500 > >From: "William Hindman" <wdhindman at bellsouth.net> > >Subject: Re: [AccessD] A2K3 ADP > >To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" > > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > >Message-ID: <001901c5ec58$54a7fde0$6101a8c0 at JISREGISTRATION.local> > >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > > reply-type=original > > > >...just call me Dinosaurus Rex :) > > > >Willam >