[AccessD] The future of Access, .NET and SQL

What for do you need to embed .NET Framework dependencies?

Once again, I did use standard edition for USD99 for commercial
application - it' s good enough to protect the code...

HTH,
Shamil

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Boogie Loogie" <boogieloogie at gmail.com>
To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] The future of Access, .NET and SQL


> > I used one of them - Xenocode - http://www.xenocode.com - even its
> > standard
> > edition for USD99 looks good enough to well protect the code.
> > IMO to reverse engineer a well obfuscated code is a task comparable with
> > developing similar code from scratch.
>
>
>
> >From what I read I would need the enterprise edition at $1400.00 because
I
> have to embed** .NET Framework dependencies. A little pricy to do
something
> that Microsoft should have done within their development suite.
>
> BL
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com