[AccessD] The future of Access, .NET and SQL

Ok I will give the cheap version a try. I had been hoping to embed In The
Hand ADOCE.

On 9/27/05, Shamil Salakhetdinov <shamil at users.mns.ru> wrote:
>
> What for do you need to embed .NET Framework dependencies?
>
> Once again, I did use standard edition for USD99 for commercial
> application - it' s good enough to protect the code...
>
> HTH,
> Shamil
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Boogie Loogie" <boogieloogie at gmail.com>
> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 7:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] The future of Access, .NET and SQL
>
>
> > > I used one of them - Xenocode - http://www.xenocode.com - even its
> > > standard
> > > edition for USD99 looks good enough to well protect the code.
> > > IMO to reverse engineer a well obfuscated code is a task comparable
> with
> > > developing similar code from scratch.
> >
> >
> >
> > >From what I read I would need the enterprise edition at $1400.00
> because
> I
> > have to embed** .NET Framework dependencies. A little pricy to do
> something
> > that Microsoft should have done within their development suite.
> >
> > BL
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>