Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Wed Jan 18 18:06:25 CST 2006
LOL In our shop, we just yell over the cubicles, "hey, who has objectX checked out? I need to modify it!" Charlotte -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Josh McFarlane Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:32 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Source Code Control On 1/18/06, Charlotte Foust <cfoust at infostatsystems.com> wrote: > All I can say, is that I would NOT want to work with merging rather > than single-user checkouts. SourceSafe can be set up that way, but it > keeps everything a lot cleaner when two people aren't even trying to > modify the same object at the same time. Since we don't have one huge > file to deal with, I'd rather err on the side of caution. Well, you can set up Subversion to use single-locking checkouts that way too, it just gets to be a pain when one person needs to make a change to file X, along with 20 other files to get feature Y working, while another person just wants to make a typo fix in file X but has to wait 3 days to do so. Merging will generally take care of things automatically, and when people tend to work on the same line, well, it warns you and lets you fix. -- Josh McFarlane "Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding." -Albert Einstein -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com